BetaFPV C04 Camera and VTX Module
Listed as: BetaFPV C04 Camera and VTX Module (Cetus VTX V2)
Of the 81 other 5.8 GHz analog video transmitters in our database, 11 have a lower maximum power than the C04 Camera and VTX Module (350 mW, 25 dBm), 5 the same and 65 a higher one; the class median is 800 mW.
| System | analog |
|---|---|
| Max power | 350 mW |
| Frequency range | 5.8 GHz |
| Input voltage | 5V |
| Channels | 8 |
| Price (approx.) | 47.99 USD |
Choosing between systems? See analog vs DJI vs Walksnail vs HDZero.
Where this data comes from
Cited to BetaFPV, whose labelled block covers both versions of this module in one line each: 'Output power: 25-400mW (M04 VTX)/ 25-350mW (Cetus VTX V2)' and 'Frequency: 5 bands 40 channels with Raceband (M04 VTX), 1 band 8 channels (B band) (Cetus VTX V2)'. This entry is the Cetus V2 SKU, so max_power_mw 350 was right and channels is 8 - a transmitter locked to one band, the second in this column after iFlight's BLITZ Race. weight_g is REMOVED: the block's only weight is '4.14g (with antenna)', and a weight stated with the antenna on is not this column's weight (the rule the Happymodel Whoop_VTX_HP set). model_set gives the part BetaFPV's own name with the version it is; the scrape had it as 'C04 and Module - Cetus V2', and the slug does not move. The module is a camera and a transmitter soldered together - a 1/3" CMOS 1200TVL 160deg camera on the other side of the same 14.5*21*23.5mm body - which is the AIO class question still open under 'Needs a human'; it stays in the vtx class because that is where the scrape filed it and a published URL does not move.